From owner-freebsd-security Wed Oct 16 17: 9:33 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3238A37B401 for ; Wed, 16 Oct 2002 17:09:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from caligula.anu.edu.au (caligula.anu.edu.au [150.203.224.42]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2929643E6A for ; Wed, 16 Oct 2002 17:09:31 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from avalon@caligula.anu.edu.au) Received: (from avalon@localhost) by caligula.anu.edu.au (8.9.3/8.9.3) id KAA02471; Thu, 17 Oct 2002 10:09:16 +1000 (EST) From: Darren Reed Message-Id: <200210170009.KAA02471@caligula.anu.edu.au> Subject: Re: CERT VU#539363 To: mike@adept.org (Mike Hoskins) Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2002 10:09:16 +1000 (Australia/ACT) Cc: freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <20021016124439.T4295-100000@fubar.adept.org> from "Mike Hoskins" at Oct 16, 2002 01:02:53 PM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL1] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org In some mail from Mike Hoskins, sie said: > > > I'm sure everyone saw this on Bugtraq, firewalls, firewall-wizards, etc... > But I noticed Apple was quick to resond with a 'we're not vulnerable' > regarding OS X and wondered if we could draw similar conclusions. If they don't do stateful filtering then they are not vulnerable. Guess we know what version of ipfw is/isn't in OSX then, eh ? Darren To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message