From owner-freebsd-current Thu Dec 16 10:11: 9 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from ns.mt.sri.com (ns.mt.sri.com [206.127.79.91]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FCC515110 for ; Thu, 16 Dec 1999 10:11:06 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from nate@mt.sri.com) Received: from mt.sri.com (rocky.mt.sri.com [206.127.76.100]) by ns.mt.sri.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id LAA06817; Thu, 16 Dec 1999 11:10:46 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from nate@rocky.mt.sri.com) Received: by mt.sri.com (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4) id LAA19919; Thu, 16 Dec 1999 11:10:45 -0700 Date: Thu, 16 Dec 1999 11:10:45 -0700 Message-Id: <199912161810.LAA19919@mt.sri.com> From: Nate Williams MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Poul-Henning Kamp Cc: mjacob@feral.com, Ollivier Robert , "FreeBSD Current Users' list" Subject: Re: HEADSUP: ntp4 to replace xntpd In-Reply-To: <16818.945366687@critter.freebsd.dk> References: <16818.945366687@critter.freebsd.dk> X-Mailer: VM 6.34 under 19.16 "Lille" XEmacs Lucid Reply-To: nate@mt.sri.com (Nate Williams) Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > Between the two of us Dave Mills and I have managed to get the > "nanokernel" to act sensibly in the domain inside +/- 1usec which > the old one didn't. (See http://gps.freebsd.dk for what kind of > performance this can result in, given appropriate hardware). You may not know the answer to this, but it's worth a shot. Wht kind of accuracy can we expect using 'cheap' off-the-shelf GPS receivers? Nate To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message