Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2018 08:49:47 -0700 From: Ian Lepore <ian@freebsd.org> To: Hubert Hauser <hubot@mail.com>, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Running Tor service in the jail environment Message-ID: <1544543387.1860.347.camel@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <66526968-1446-c95e-629a-fb9e1b246111@mail.com> References: <66526968-1446-c95e-629a-fb9e1b246111@mail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 2018-12-11 at 01:41 +0000, Hubert Hauser wrote: > I want to torify my FreeBSD old machine purposed to mainly darknet > activities. > > Should I worry about these errors during creating jail? > > > > > Warning: Some services already seem to be listening on all IP, > (including 127.0.1.1) This may cause some confusion, here they are: > root > ntpd 58008 20 udp6 *:123 *:* root ntpd 58008 21 udp4 *:123 *:* root > lpd > 48726 6 tcp6 *:515 *:* root lpd 48726 7 tcp4 *:515 *:* Warning: Some > services already seem to be listening on IP 192.168.1.105 This may > cause > some confusion, here they are: root ntpd 58008 23 udp4 > 192.168.1.105:123 > *:* Warning: Some services already seem to be listening on all IP, > (including 192.168.1.105) This may cause some confusion, here they > are: > root ntpd 58008 20 udp6 *:123 *:* root ntpd 58008 21 udp4 *:123 *:* > root > lpd 48726 6 tcp6 *:515 *:* root lpd 48726 7 tcp4 *:515 *:| > > Should jail have access to loopback interface and public Ethernet > interface assuming that all traffic from this machine will be routed > through Tor? Is it necessary to set up a virtual network interface to > communicate between jails? You should not be running ntpd inside a jail, it won't have the priveleges to set the kernel clock anyway, only the ntpd running in a non-jailed environment can do that. I suspect the same is true of lpd, but I've never used that and know nothing about it. -- Ian
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1544543387.1860.347.camel>