Date: Mon, 06 Mar 2006 13:24:23 +0000 From: Nik Clayton <nik@ngo.org.uk> To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=F8rgrav?= <des@des.no> Cc: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Subversion? (Re: HEADS UP: Importing csup into base) Message-ID: <440C3807.9010007@ngo.org.uk> In-Reply-To: <86veurzvmm.fsf@xps.des.no> References: <20060304141957.14716.qmail@web32705.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <20060304152433.W61086@fledge.watson.org> <BA422F74-E7F9-4F53-9A88-B89E2255FF00@behanna.org> <200603051930.25957.peter@wemm.org> <20060306102622.GB21025@tara.freenix.org> <86veurzvmm.fsf@xps.des.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote: >>> 5) And this is the kicker.. most client metadata is kept on the client! >>> This is the very reason why we cannot use perforce for freebsd.org for >>> everybody. The number of checkouts is way too large. svn keeps most >>> of this on the client, so this scales easily with more clients. >> Including a full copy of all files and more metadata. > > not if you use svk (on the other hand, it keeps a full copy of the repo) ... if you[1] choose. You can, of course, choose what to mirror down to single paths. N [1] des, I assume you know this, I wanted to make the distinction clear for others who might not be as familiar with svk.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?440C3807.9010007>