From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 13 20:59:27 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (unknown [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBDAA106567E for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 20:59:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from tower.berklix.org (tower.berklix.org [83.236.223.114]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46A128FC1D for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 20:59:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mart.js.berklix.net (p5DCBEFB3.dip.t-dialin.net [93.203.239.179]) (authenticated bits=0) by tower.berklix.org (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id q5DKxPKI080070; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 20:59:26 GMT (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from fire.js.berklix.net (fire.js.berklix.net [192.168.91.41]) by mart.js.berklix.net (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id q5DKxEM0056106; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 22:59:14 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from fire.js.berklix.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fire.js.berklix.net (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q5DKx2id020906; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 22:59:08 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from jhs@fire.js.berklix.net) Message-Id: <201206132059.q5DKx2id020906@fire.js.berklix.net> To: "Simon" From: "Julian H. Stacey" Organization: http://berklix.com BSD Unix Linux Consultancy, Munich Germany User-agent: EXMH on FreeBSD http://berklix.com/free/ X-URL: http://www.berklix.com In-reply-to: Your message "Wed, 13 Jun 2012 16:33:51 EDT." <20120613203348.35B3F106564A@hub.freebsd.org> Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2012 22:59:02 +0200 Sender: jhs@berklix.com Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: FreeBSD 8.3 + MySQL 5.0.95 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2012 20:59:27 -0000 Hi Simon > Thanks Julian. The reason for freebsd-questions is because when I looked > thru isp, database, and performance, and few others, they had one or two > threads a month with barely much input. Yup, isp@ is quiet, some other lists too, doesn't necessarily mean there'snot good people listening, though I suspect total sub. # on isp@ might be low. > I figured I would reach more people > on this list. Certainly lots, but some specialist lists have good people listening, & less troll noise than lately on questions@. > The reason why I didn't use freebsd-hackers is because I thought > perhaps this was somewhat trivial, like I was overlooking something, but I > guess not. Next time I'll just use that list instead. I think it would be my best bet. Welcome to hackers@ & the rest :-) PS The one list I periodicaly notice is not quite there, & or a handbook entry either I think, is something for all of us who periodically suspect a machine is maybe a bit sick, & want to give it a damn good thrashing to test it. Well, complex issue, & "how long is a piece of string ?" but there's performance@ & ports@ for ideas & tools etc. Good luck. Cheers, Julian -- Julian Stacey, BSD Unix Linux C Sys Eng Consultants Munich http://berklix.com Reply below not above, cumulative like a play script, & indent with "> ". Format: Plain text. Not HTML, multipart/alternative, base64, quoted-printable. Mail from @yahoo dumped @berklix. http://berklix.org/yahoo/