From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Jun 30 19:00:27 2009
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62E2D1065680
	for <freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org>; Tue, 30 Jun 2009 19:00:27 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from nox@jelal.kn-bremen.de)
Received: from smtp.kn-bremen.de (gelbbaer.kn-bremen.de [78.46.108.116])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F0A98FC17
	for <freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org>; Tue, 30 Jun 2009 19:00:26 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from nox@jelal.kn-bremen.de)
Received: by smtp.kn-bremen.de (Postfix, from userid 10)
	id 3B3671E001FA; Tue, 30 Jun 2009 21:00:26 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from triton.kn-bremen.de (noident@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by triton.kn-bremen.de (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n5UIwut2041374;
	Tue, 30 Jun 2009 20:58:56 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from nox@triton.kn-bremen.de)
Received: (from nox@localhost)
	by triton.kn-bremen.de (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id n5UIwuM0041373;
	Tue, 30 Jun 2009 20:58:56 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from nox)
From: Juergen Lock <nox@jelal.kn-bremen.de>
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 20:58:56 +0200
To: Alexander Best <alexbestms@math.uni-muenster.de>
Message-ID: <20090630185856.GA41198@triton.kn-bremen.de>
References: <200906301828.n5UISAd0035828@triton.kn-bremen.de>
	<permail-200906301838491e86ffa800001d04-a_best01@message-id.uni-muenster.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <permail-200906301838491e86ffa800001d04-a_best01@message-id.uni-muenster.de>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org, Juergen Lock <nox@jelal.kn-bremen.de>
Subject: Re: nspluginwrapper patch for testing (was: Re: flash10 vs f10)
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 19:00:27 -0000

On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 08:38:49PM +0200, Alexander Best wrote:
> i'm running compat.linux.osrelease: 2.6.16 and r195173 (CURRENT).
> 
> yep. the warning comes up if a users stacksize is limited < 32M. flash works
> great and the HD button isn't causing any problems.
> 
> maybe it's possible to ad something like
> 
> if ulimit < 32m then don't change ulimit and prinf("not setting new ulimit due
> to stacksize limitation").
> 
> something like that....

Well I just redirected the (possible) error message to /dev/null in
the new version since the main point of this ulimit'ing is to get
rid of a too high limit that can exhibit a flash bug.  So If the
limit is already lower that shouldn't cause a problem unless maybe
when it is _very_ low indeed...

 Cheers,
	Juergen