From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 27 14:08:31 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E231816A4BF for ; Wed, 27 Aug 2003 14:08:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from kanga.honeypot.net (kanga.honeypot.net [208.162.254.122]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEEC643FDF for ; Wed, 27 Aug 2003 14:08:29 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kirk@strauser.com) Received: from pooh.strauser.com (pooh.honeypot.net [10.0.5.128]) by kanga.honeypot.net (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h7RL8PFn020816; Wed, 27 Aug 2003 16:08:26 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from kirk@strauser.com) To: "Charles Howse" References: <009f01c36cdd$145b8420$04fea8c0@moe> From: Kirk Strauser Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2003 16:08:25 -0500 In-Reply-To: <009f01c36cdd$145b8420$04fea8c0@moe> (Charles Howse's message of "Wed, 27 Aug 2003 15:52:04 -0500") Message-ID: <874r02q052.fsf@strauser.com> Lines: 21 X-Mailer: Gnus/5.1002 (Gnus v5.10.2) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Freebsd ufs under WIN X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2003 21:08:32 -0000 --=-=-= Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable At 2003-08-27T20:52:04Z, "Charles Howse" writes: > The question was: >> is there any utility that can mount Freebsd UFS under win for read/write. I am almost 100% certain that the real question was: "Is there a utility that can mount a FreeBSD UFS partition read/write from a hard drive installed in a Windows box?" > I have a FBSD machine running Samba. I 'share' certain directories within > smb.conf. When I browse the Samba shares from my Windows XP Pro machine, > not only can I read and write to them, I can mount them as as a Network > drive, which is essentialy the same as a local drive. I understand your point, but I believe that the key was that the poster specified "UFS" directly. =2D-=20 Kirk Strauser --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQA/TR3J5sRg+Y0CpvERAnHWAJ9HomMaSXvj9MihD04+EBLR4oyZlQCfQd0Z hGrmchnE94LsJW4rc5xYwtI= =y7EG -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--