From nobody Tue Nov 29 00:30:10 2022 X-Original-To: fortran@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4NLjsZ39yGz4jND8 for ; Tue, 29 Nov 2022 00:30:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4NLjsZ163bz3wXT for ; Tue, 29 Nov 2022 00:30:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1669681810; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=WugMh0HZf+FSzRdZjMcJNok0ASeyDrqu5svy0DXU1h4=; b=PVaE38/p+ldbQjnEKbVIBklDzTiXJeDxoH6/gn2LfV9EwEdSqKHYMnsW852glMXi94yuq2 HYAnqcqmzLT+rCKVslphOG0Y+ovQJreN7S4vE0j2bdOGclJOA2JeQ27Bjm7XGN3gC/goh5 H2wwQX2M+NA7pIE6W/BungEAZLn1Byw7vh8WeHq6PKtaDvNR3MLF2AwavIFUDGrPwjpB+D Fvc3ajfHRSDWXLC41LIgMxrjdDQ45+4WS9SeurGdwG6T7TqwTqfrbGXszyrSx/wSA8J9JE B/9NSwsEcHnwcmRvBMuavIB4BV5aNq790hWaSdSOML1trzBEmRo4VyR+VYtDLw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx1.freebsd.org; none ARC-Seal: i=1; s=dkim; d=freebsd.org; t=1669681810; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=BckyXGbVCd4hbQ85W7y3pGpbJbmtQ/WrOPFmvKSv42Q0dXyuIE0U8m0hhrgVqQ+LJqMyRY NoM88ZDi4Z8gDpiLzRxJ1636YOUNXGHELnEm+nuvz5gCKn5UtcPdAWtEW/KKRuZS7fl0/S Du2KxCSwAtfbhepisdeQDb5NLo3xKTIowMHA781p1yCrFpa3Wt95KJcktJX4ovnfxZu1wh TJIhjZUpqIihFw4WiKaeBP72rO9feBsbxSWTk4TNIGSa40NF5KsZMlXRMYzIvLTSpSetRJ VeBpD+TjyEKOF88wi/cHe8djuqAcDXmONW4Nj4E3L/npNYbHKehaxCO5WkjXVw== Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4NLjsZ04GMzxXn for ; Tue, 29 Nov 2022 00:30:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 2AT0U9T4011815 for ; Tue, 29 Nov 2022 00:30:09 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 2AT0U9Cd011813 for fortran@FreeBSD.org; Tue, 29 Nov 2022 00:30:09 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: fortran@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 268023] math/suitesparse update deleted ability to select BLAS libraries, was this intended? Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2022 00:30:10 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: alt2600@icloud.com X-Bugzilla-Status: Closed X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: fortran@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback+ X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated List-Id: Fortran on FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-fortran List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-fortran@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D268023 --- Comment #4 from alt2600@icloud.com --- (In reply to Thierry Thomas from comment #2) upgrade using ATLAS worked fine. Thank you. wondering, after your work fixing lapack for atlas, there was something in = the bugzilla/or somewhere anyway that you might be looking at updating atlas at= the time. Have you started? I was thinking of giving it a go if not. I know it = is mainly comparing our patches against what went upstream and its a lot of patches to compare. Would also likely look to use the DEV branch as upstream says it has better optimizations than the release for modern archs, ie anyt= hing we are using these days for computers. Wouldn't be able to test sparc, or t= he other archs, maybe powerpc? not sure, but certainly could test against amd64 and dependent software in our ports tree. let me know. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=