From owner-freebsd-isdn@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 7 13:22:43 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-isdn@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E6A816A4CE for ; Fri, 7 May 2004 13:22:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gwyn.kn-bremen.de (gwyn.kn-bremen.de [212.63.36.242]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9950E43D2F for ; Fri, 7 May 2004 13:22:40 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from nox@saturn.kn-bremen.de) Received: from gwyn.kn-bremen.de (uucp@gwyn [127.0.0.1]) i47KMTOg019829; Fri, 7 May 2004 22:22:29 +0200 Received: from saturn.kn-bremen.de (uucp@localhost)i47KMTbE019827; Fri, 7 May 2004 22:22:29 +0200 Received: (from nox@localhost) by saturn.kn-bremen.de (8.11.4/8.8.5) id i47KUKT74263; Fri, 7 May 2004 22:30:20 +0200 (CEST) From: Juergen Lock Date: Fri, 7 May 2004 22:30:19 +0200 To: Juha-Matti Liukkonen Message-ID: <20040507223018.A73746@saturn.kn-bremen.de> References: <20040427183104.A72883@saturn.kn-bremen.de> <20040506183919.A39741@saturn.kn-bremen.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0pre3i In-Reply-To: cc: freebsd-isdn@freebsd.org Subject: Re: default MSN X-BeenThere: freebsd-isdn@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Using ISDN with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 May 2004 20:22:43 -0000 On Thu, May 06, 2004 at 08:49:45PM +0300, Juha-Matti Liukkonen wrote: > Hi, > > giving MSN 0 via local-phone-dialout makes at least the AVM CAPI > adapters (B1 BRI, T1 PRI) default properly when CONNECT_REQ is sent > (the callee sees the base number of the interface's number space with > PRI, or the primary number with BRI). > Ahaa! So capi already does it, this i didn't know. > This behaviour is _not_ defined in the CAPI 2.0 specification, though > (Calling Party Number struct, p.81, and CONNECT_REQ, p.27, in > COMMON-ISDN-API Version 2.0, Part I, 4th Edition), and may thus be only > an AVM feature. Definitely worth a check if/when other manufacturers' > CAPI adapters become supported. > I guess it comes from Linux, there the passive drivers (hisax) do this too (which is where i looked). Does the capi spec require a Calling Party Number be sent, or can it also be empty? > Br, > Jussi Greetings, Juergen