From owner-freebsd-hackers  Tue Apr 10 16:46: 1 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Received: from gandalf.vi.bravenet.com (gandalf.bravenet.com [139.142.105.50])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id ED5AB37B422
	for <freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>; Tue, 10 Apr 2001 16:45:54 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from dphoenix@bravenet.com)
Received: (qmail 3902 invoked by uid 1000); 10 Apr 2001 23:45:54 -0000
Received: from localhost (sendmail-bs@127.0.0.1)
  by localhost with SMTP; 10 Apr 2001 23:45:54 -0000
Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2001 16:45:54 -0700 (PDT)
From: Dan Phoenix <dphoenix@bravenet.com>
To: Alfred Perlstein <bright@wintelcom.net>
Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: lockf in apache
In-Reply-To: <20010410150416.E15938@fw.wintelcom.net>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSO.4.21.0104101645180.1954-100000@gandalf.bravenet.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG



thanks alot for your help alfred much appreciated.
you were right all lockf's turned to accepts right after
i made that change.....thanks again.



On Tue, 10 Apr 2001, Alfred Perlstein wrote:

> Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2001 15:04:16 -0700
> From: Alfred Perlstein <bright@wintelcom.net>
> To: Dan Phoenix <dphoenix@bravenet.com>
> Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
> Subject: Re: lockf in apache
> 
> At a glance the following config should work.  If apache is not in
> 'accept' then you've done something wrong.
> 
> 
> * Dan Phoenix <dphoenix@bravenet.com> [010410 15:01] wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > Ok let's take this for example
> > 
> > Listen 172.16.0.26:80
> > Listen 172.16.6.2:80
> > 
> > NameVirtualHost 172.16.0.26:80
> > NameVirtualHost 172.16.6.2:80
> > 
> > <VirtualHost 172.16.0.26:80 172.16.6.2:80>
> > 
> > .6.2 is real ip for load balancer.
> > .0.x is for internal use
> > 
> > so let;s rewrite.
> > 
> > Bind *
> > Port 80
> > 
> > NameVirtualHost 172.16.0.26
> > NameVirtualHost 172.16.6.2
> > 
> > <VirtualHost 172.16.6.2>
> > 
> > 
> > this the idea?
> > not even sure why .0.26 etc was setup tha tis just for internal testing
> > but a good thing to have...maybe a 
> > NameVirtual *
> > VirtualHost *
> > 
> > not sure if i can get away with that....i will play with it for abit..
> > let me know if you already know off hand.
> > reason we even have namevirtualhost is because we have alot of 
> > virtual hosts setup and is required in that case as they all use same ip
> > address.
> > 
> > 
> 


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message