From owner-freebsd-current Sun May 28 17:58:34 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from happy.checkpoint.com (happy.checkpoint.com [199.203.156.41]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B20BE37B9DC for ; Sun, 28 May 2000 17:58:30 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mellon@pobox.com) Received: (from mellon@localhost) by happy.checkpoint.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id DAA09425; Mon, 29 May 2000 03:59:31 GMT (envelope-from mellon@pobox.com) Date: Mon, 29 May 2000 03:59:31 +0000 From: Anatoly Vorobey To: Warner Losh Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Internal compiler error: program ld got fatal signal 10 Message-ID: <20000529035931.A9407@happy.checkpoint.com> References: <200005282312.RAA36480@harmony.village.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0.1i In-Reply-To: <200005282312.RAA36480@harmony.village.org>; from imp@village.org on Sun, May 28, 2000 at 05:12:05PM -0600 Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sun, May 28, 2000 at 05:12:05PM -0600, Warner Losh wrote: > I think that this is strong evidence that there are bugs in the new > binutils that AJ is finding. I think it may be that it incorrectly > expects memory to be zero'd when it gets it or something. I've further verified that: - it's J that's causing the problem, even without A present. - the assembler generates identical .o files with or without the J option of malloc, so it's really an ld problem. I think you're right, and it expects a zeroed-out malloced memory somewhere. I'll try to hunt for it in spare time. -- Anatoly Vorobey, mellon@pobox.com http://pobox.com/~mellon/ "Angels can fly because they take themselves lightly" - G.K.Chesterton To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message