From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 29 06:57:20 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67B22106566B for ; Sun, 29 Mar 2009 06:57:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rdivacky@vlk.vlakno.cz) Received: from vlakno.cz (77-93-215-190.static.masterinter.net [77.93.215.190]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FA748FC19 for ; Sun, 29 Mar 2009 06:57:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rdivacky@vlk.vlakno.cz) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by vlakno.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 956199CB08E; Sun, 29 Mar 2009 08:56:40 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at vlakno.cz Received: from vlakno.cz ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (lev.vlakno.cz [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MbRD9n3Ok0F6; Sun, 29 Mar 2009 08:56:29 +0200 (CEST) Received: from vlk.vlakno.cz (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by vlakno.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 029139CB102; Sun, 29 Mar 2009 08:56:28 +0200 (CEST) Received: (from rdivacky@localhost) by vlk.vlakno.cz (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id n2T6uRVQ008671; Sun, 29 Mar 2009 08:56:27 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from rdivacky) Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2009 08:56:27 +0200 From: Roman Divacky To: Chuck Robey Message-ID: <20090329065627.GA4994@freebsd.org> References: <18875.60334.947446.966085@gromit.timing.com> <20090315.080814.669286040.imp@bsdimp.com> <18877.57878.136116.691250@gromit.timing.com> <20090318.183646.-593221015.imp@bsdimp.com> <18881.38984.133668.539997@gromit.timing.com> <49C19F2A.10406@elischer.org> <18881.42546.640583.971867@gromit.timing.com> <49CEC2C0.3020902@telenix.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <49CEC2C0.3020902@telenix.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Cc: arch@freebsd.org, John Hein , Julian Elischer Subject: Re: Final sanity pass: xdev X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2009 06:57:20 -0000 On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 08:37:20PM -0400, Chuck Robey wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > > > I was going to ask in ports about this, but you folks really sound like you know > the llvm tool a whole lot better, and if, in answering my question, you > happened to answer things like benchmark results and if it makes good kernels, > well, you wouldn't hear me complaining. > > Anyhow, my question regards the llvm-devel port. The install phase wants to > build python26. Is that because the author of the port likes python26, or would > it really work if I used my presently available python25? I could fix my > makefile, if it'd work ok, but I need to understand why our llvm port needs > python26, before I shoot myself in the foot. the llvm/clang ships with a compiler driver that is written in python, the driver is being replaced by a C++ one. the C++ one currently works "just fine". expect the python dependency to be removed in a near future roman