From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 15 16:19:04 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 995E516A41C; Wed, 15 Jun 2005 16:19:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (CPE0050040655c8-CM00111ae02aac.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com [69.194.102.232]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4773843D5C; Wed, 15 Jun 2005 16:19:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 0FBC25124F; Wed, 15 Jun 2005 12:19:03 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2005 12:19:02 -0400 From: Kris Kennaway To: Dejan Lesjak Message-ID: <20050615161902.GA81527@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <200506150243.j5F2habT053985@repoman.freebsd.org> <200506151352.48180.dejan.lesjak@ijs.si> <20050615141103.lupteudmxccko4ww@netchild.homeip.net> <200506151442.22406.dejan.lesjak@ijs.si> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="EVF5PPMfhYS0aIcm" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200506151442.22406.dejan.lesjak@ijs.si> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: Dejan Lesjak , Michael Johnson , cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, Alexander Leidinger Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/astro/gpsdrive pkg-plist ports/audio/gqmpeg-devel pkg-plist ports/databases/pgworksheet pkg-plist ports/deskutils/hot-babe pkg-plist ports/deskutils/xchm pkg-plist ports/editors/abiword-devel pkg-plist ports/games/crimson ... X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2005 16:19:04 -0000 --EVF5PPMfhYS0aIcm Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Jun 15, 2005 at 02:42:21PM +0200, Dejan Lesjak wrote: > On Wednesday 15 of June 2005 14:11, Alexander Leidinger wrote: > > Dejan Lesjak wrote: > > > Well, if they are empty, why not? It is actually rather unavoidable. I > > > could be missing something, but this is how I understand things: > > > > Technically we don't need to update the revisions, but our policy (as f= ar > > as I understand it) is: if the plist changes, we bump the revision. > > > > I will not complain if you don't bump the revisions of affected ports (= e.g. > > when nobody else thinks the ports need a revision bump), I just mention= ed > > the common practice so far. >=20 > Sure, and I'm just trying to explain why I think the bump is not needed i= n=20 > this case and hopefully make you agree on this :) Basically I was trying = to=20 > stick with this part of Porter's Handbook: >=20 > A rule of thumb is to ask yourself whether a change committed to a port i= s=20 > something which everyone would benefit from having (either because of an= =20 > enhancement, fix, or by virtue that the new package will actually work at= =20 > all), and weigh that against that fact that it will cause everyone who=20 > regularly updates their ports tree to be compelled to update. If yes, the= =20 > PORTREVISION should be bumped. >=20 > And I did not think that this change is compelling enough to cause everyo= ne to=20 > update this ports. I agree. This should not cause anyone any hardship. Kris --EVF5PPMfhYS0aIcm Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFCsFT2Wry0BWjoQKURAissAJ9Z6mNI7dDQd1an3iSscRWBK0Bw6wCguM5V oUYEnYAY6otw+3DwipMicQ8= =4DwE -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --EVF5PPMfhYS0aIcm--