From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 11 11:47:49 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 52DE2126; Sat, 11 Jan 2014 11:47:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mailrelay008.isp.belgacom.be (mailrelay008.isp.belgacom.be [195.238.6.174]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B60F81CDE; Sat, 11 Jan 2014 11:47:48 +0000 (UTC) X-Belgacom-Dynamic: yes X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AroGANwt0VJbsUxj/2dsb2JhbABZgws4ULlugQQXdIIlAQEBBDocIxALGAklDyoeBhMbh1UDFQEDvX4dhRoXjwcHhDcBA5gWjF6FOIMuOw Received: from 99.76-177-91.adsl-dyn.isp.belgacom.be (HELO kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org) ([91.177.76.99]) by relay.skynet.be with ESMTP; 11 Jan 2014 12:46:38 +0100 Received: from kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org (kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org [127.0.0.1]) by kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id s0BBkavY001324; Sat, 11 Jan 2014 12:46:36 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from tijl@FreeBSD.org) Date: Sat, 11 Jan 2014 12:46:36 +0100 From: Tijl Coosemans To: CeDeROM Subject: Re: FreeBSD 10.0-RC5 AMD64 pkg upgrade fail by gcc/gcc46 Message-ID: <20140111124636.216d7838@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Gerald Pfeifer , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Jan 2014 11:47:49 -0000 On Sat, 11 Jan 2014 11:37:50 +0100 CeDeROM wrote: > On Sat, Jan 11, 2014 at 11:29 AM, CeDeROM wrote: >> On Sat, Jan 11, 2014 at 3:18 AM, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: >>> Wait a minute: is one of yoir ports hard coding lang/gcc46 instead of >>> doing USE_GCC? If so, here is the bug. > > Here goes the full ouput of the "pkg upgrade" maybe it will help you > find the solution :-) > > http://tny.cz/c8b678b2 The problem is pdftk-2.02. You need pdftk-2.02_1 for which a package has been built already so it should be on the pkg mirrors soon.