From owner-freebsd-threads@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Jun 30 19:29:21 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-threads@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-threads@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B76C37B401
	for <threads@freebsd.org>; Mon, 30 Jun 2003 19:29:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from web80503.mail.yahoo.com (web80503.mail.yahoo.com
	[66.218.79.73])	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BAAF943F3F
	for <threads@freebsd.org>; Mon, 30 Jun 2003 19:29:20 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from xiongjinshan@yahoo.com)
Message-ID: <20030701022915.50290.qmail@web80503.mail.yahoo.com>
Received: from [218.79.98.26] by web80503.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP;
	Mon, 30 Jun 2003 19:29:15 PDT
Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2003 19:29:15 -0700 (PDT)
From: xiong jinshan <xiongjinshan@yahoo.com>
To: deischen@freebsd.org
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.10.10306302207020.26781-100000@pcnet5.pcnet.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
cc: threads@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: About the kse signal process
X-BeenThere: freebsd-threads@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Threading on FreeBSD <freebsd-threads.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-threads>,
	<mailto:freebsd-threads-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-threads>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-threads@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-threads-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-threads>,
	<mailto:freebsd-threads-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Jul 2003 02:29:21 -0000


--- Daniel Eischen <eischen@vigrid.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 30 Jun 2003, xiong jinshan wrote:
> > It received the SIGSEGV before the main() when I
> > linked   with libc_r;(.
> 
> I think you have something screwed up somewhere.
> How did you compile and link it?

Yes, it maybe my fault. 

If I link libc_r with static, it works correctly. 
If I link it with dynamic, segv occurs.
If I not linked c_r, th_func() couldn't received the
alarm.

Why must it be linked with static mode? Does it mean
the native c library in release 5.1 not reentrant?

> 
> -- 
> Dan Eischen
> 


__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month!
http://sbc.yahoo.com