Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 27 Jun 2005 13:38:33 +0200
From:      des@des.no (=?iso-8859-1?q?Dag-Erling_Sm=F8rgrav?=)
To:        Jeremie Le Hen <jeremie@le-hen.org>
Cc:        freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: OpenPAM Figwort broke PAM modules from ports
Message-ID:  <86d5q8113a.fsf@xps.des.no>
In-Reply-To: <20050626211011.GH1283@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org> (Jeremie Le Hen's message of "Sun, 26 Jun 2005 23:10:11 %2B0200")
References:  <20050626211011.GH1283@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Jeremie Le Hen <jeremie@le-hen.org> writes:
> This prevents PAM modules installed in /usr/local/lib from being
> dlopen(3)'d.  I'm not sure whether FreeBSD really wants this new
> ``feature'' or not, but actually I think this needs a note in
> src/UPDATING to be issued, explaining that PAM modules installed from
> ports need to be specified with their full path now.

They always did.

DES
--=20
Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86d5q8113a.fsf>