From owner-freebsd-questions Fri Feb 23 06:09:27 1996 Return-Path: owner-questions Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id GAA09746 for questions-outgoing; Fri, 23 Feb 1996 06:09:27 -0800 (PST) Received: from buffnet4.buffnet.net (root@buffnet4.buffnet.net [205.246.19.13]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id GAA09739 for ; Fri, 23 Feb 1996 06:09:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from buffnet1.buffnet.net (mmdf@buffnet1.buffnet.net [205.246.19.10]) by buffnet4.buffnet.net (8.6.12/8.6.9) with SMTP id JAA27952 for ; Fri, 23 Feb 1996 09:11:02 GMT Received: from buffnet7.buffnet.net by buffnet1.buffnet.net id aa09717; 23 Feb 96 9:14 EST Date: Fri, 23 Feb 1996 09:14:42 -0500 (EST) From: Stephen Hovey To: "Matthew N. Dodd" cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Telnet Slowdown (fwd) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-questions@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk On Fri, 23 Feb 1996, Matthew N. Dodd wrote: > On Thu, 22 Feb 1996, Stephen Hovey wrote: > > On Thu, 22 Feb 1996, Garrett A. Wollman wrote: > > > I have seen no evidence to support this claim. Pony up. > > The basic symptom is a stall - as though the sockets werent any good > > anymore without an error message. > > > > If my trumpet users do not have van jacobson compression turned on for > > instance, they can connect to my freebsd news server, but cannot > > successfully pull over the entire active headers - it stops after a > > Oh, I see, Trumpet is the standard by which we measure a TCP/IP stack. > How silly of me. I've got loads of Trumpet users here and none of them No - how snotty of you. I didnt say trumpet was a standards measure. Im an ISP, I have to deal with users wanting to connect, so they gotta be able to, and most of them use trumpet. > > > or Im on the same ethernet ring it does this - different machines (some > > Theres your problem. Its not going to work if you have your ethernet > in a ring. I know some guys who did this and it didn't work for them > either. No - Its not in a ring - i just call it 'the ring' out of habit. Im not that stupid.