From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 16 16:51:31 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B62EE16A4CE; Mon, 16 Aug 2004 16:51:31 +0000 (GMT) Received: from pittgoth.com (14.zlnp1.xdsl.nauticom.net [209.195.149.111]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4158443D49; Mon, 16 Aug 2004 16:51:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from trhodes@FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost (acs-24-154-239-170.zoominternet.net [24.154.239.170]) (authenticated bits=0) by pittgoth.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i7GGpS0l063574 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 16 Aug 2004 12:51:30 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from trhodes@FreeBSD.org) Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2004 12:52:04 -0400 From: Tom Rhodes To: Murray Stokely Message-Id: <20040816125204.17754986@localhost> In-Reply-To: <20040816073224.GB71136@hub.freebsd.org> References: <200408141519.i7EFJ5dW043117@repoman.freebsd.org> <20040814152137.GR87690@submonkey.net> <20040816073224.GB71136@hub.freebsd.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 0.9.12 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd5.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: doc-committers@FreeBSD.org cc: cvs-doc@FreeBSD.org cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/share/sgml/glossary freebsd-glossary.sgml X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2004 16:51:31 -0000 On Mon, 16 Aug 2004 07:32:25 +0000 Murray Stokely wrote: > On Sat, Aug 14, 2004 at 04:21:37PM +0100, Ceri Davies wrote: > > The vast majority of the terms need the glossdef elements filling in - > > I was told that it was preferable for me to commit this in this state > > over waiting for me to fill them all in; if everybody takes a letter > > from their surname and fills those ones in then we'll have this > > populated in no time. > > It was just a suggestion after you assigned yourself the PR, since it > seemed like far too much work for one person to do in any reasonable > amount of time. > > What did I get us in to? =) > > *hides for cover before people make him define all the S terms* > /me takes the whip and shouts "Get to work!" -- Tom Rhodes