From owner-freebsd-isp Thu Jul 25 6:35:30 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13CCC37B400 for ; Thu, 25 Jul 2002 06:35:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from webmail.emre.de (webmail.emre.de [194.8.203.50]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDE8343E6E for ; Thu, 25 Jul 2002 06:35:26 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from info@emre.de) Received: from webmail.emre.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by webmail.emre.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F70A26C01 for ; Thu, 25 Jul 2002 15:35:20 +0200 (CEST) Received: (from www@localhost) by webmail.emre.de (8.12.5/8.12.5/Submit) id g6PDZKSJ045261 for freebsd-isp@freebsd.org; Thu, 25 Jul 2002 15:35:20 +0200 (CEST) X-Authentication-Warning: webmail.emre.de: www set sender to info@emre.de using -f Received: from 194.8.193.125 ( [194.8.193.125]) as user emre@webmail.emre.de by webmail.emre.de with HTTP; Thu, 25 Jul 2002 15:35:20 +0200 Message-ID: <1027604120.3d3ffe981a72e@webmail.emre.de> Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2002 15:35:20 +0200 From: Emre Bastuz To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Software for IP accounting? References: <1027602330.3d3ff79a18bd6@webmail.emre.de> <3D3FF954.90807@caravan.ru> In-Reply-To: <3D3FF954.90807@caravan.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 3.0 X-Originating-IP: 194.8.193.125 Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Hi Alexey, Zitat von Alexey G Misurenko : > Why are you thinking that that netflow is not scabaible? > Currently counted and analized traffic of our network > is about 60Mbit/s for outgoing streams and 45Mbit/s. well ... maybe the expression "does not scale" was a little bit misleading. There are two concerns when thinking of netflow: - how does it perform with speed up to 100MB and even Gigabit Ethernet? - as far as I have heard, there are serious issues when you try using netflow in an environment with Cisco 6500´s + CEF I´m not much into the netflow stuff, just heard the discussions of my colleagues. I ´m really curious about how other ISP´s handle that kind of stuff. Any input welcome :) Regards, Emre -- Emre Bastuz info@emre.de http://www.emre.de UIN: 561260 PGP Key ID: 0xAFAC77FD ------------------------------------------------- This mail sent through IMP: http://horde.org/imp/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message