From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Mar 26 17:58:31 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A938216A4CE
	for <ports@freebsd.org>; Fri, 26 Mar 2004 17:58:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from endif.cjb.net (65-101-229-205.dnvr.qwest.net [65.101.229.205])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DF20E43D2F
	for <ports@freebsd.org>; Fri, 26 Mar 2004 17:58:28 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from end@endif.cjb.net)
Received: (qmail 64983 invoked from network); 27 Mar 2004 01:58:25 -0000
Received: from localhost (127.0.0.1)
  by localhost with SMTP; 27 Mar 2004 01:58:25 -0000
Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2004 18:58:25 -0700
From: Robin Schoonover <end@endif.cjb.net>
To: Sergey Matveychuk <sem@ciam.ru>
In-Reply-To: <20040327022929.B22129@avim.ciam.ru>
References: <opr5eiuf0f8ckrg5@smtp.central.cox.net>
	<c3uoks$193u$1@kemoauc.mips.inka.de>
	<4062FF7A.2040509@ciam.ru>
	<c3v3kn$1drs$1@kemoauc.mips.inka.de>
	<20040326232205.GD57192@sirius.firepipe.net>
	<20040327022929.B22129@avim.ciam.ru>
X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.10claws (GTK+ 1.2.10;
	i386-portbld-freebsd5.2.1)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <20040327015828.DF20E43D2F@mx1.FreeBSD.org>
cc: ports@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Sign your name in pkg-descr is useless or useful?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2004 01:58:31 -0000

On Sat, 27 Mar 2004 02:47:46 +0300 (MSK), Sergey Matveychuk wrote:
> > The reason I suggested the first syntax is so just the email
> > address could be simply parsed.
> 
> IMHO Email address could be simply parsed any way.
> Regexp not so difficult for it:
> [A-Za-z0-9_-]+@[A-Za-z0-9-]+(\.[A-Za-z0-9-]+)*\.[A-Za-z]+
> it could be more complex of course for more strict errors chechking.
> 

You can have . in the first part too (and probably other characters).  You
don't know how complex and difficult it can be to parse an email addresses
until you actually try to bring a regexp into use. :P

-- 
Robin Schoonover (aka End)
#
# If a program is useless, it will be documented
#