From owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 6 11:49:01 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-src@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A675F16A4CE; Sat, 6 Mar 2004 11:49:01 -0800 (PST) Received: from blake.polstra.com (blake.polstra.com [64.81.189.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F10243D1D; Sat, 6 Mar 2004 11:49:01 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jdp@polstra.com) Received: from strings.polstra.com (dsl081-189-067.sea1.dsl.speakeasy.net [64.81.189.67]) by blake.polstra.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i26Jmvmv026941; Sat, 6 Mar 2004 11:48:58 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jdp@polstra.com) Message-ID: X-Mailer: XFMail 1.5.4 on FreeBSD X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Date: Sat, 06 Mar 2004 11:48:57 -0800 (PST) From: John Polstra To: (Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?q?Sm=F8rgrav?=) X-Bogosity: No, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.019945, version=0.14.5 cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/dev/ctau ctau.c X-BeenThere: cvs-src@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the src tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Mar 2004 19:49:01 -0000 On 05-Mar-2004 Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote: > John Baldwin writes: >> "Fix tinderbox builds" doesn't imply that the tinderbox itself is broken and >> that's not the impression I got at all when I read it. We all know what the >> tinderbox is and the value of its service (such as finding glitches like >> above). Please don't be so touchy about anything which mentions tinderbox >> assuming that it's being slammed when it's not. > > well, given the number of "this works fine here, what is the tinderbox > doing wrong" comments I get... I am totally sympathetic to your position, DES! It took me about 5 years to stop getting pissed off about all the "Latest CVSup is totally broken!" subject lines that were actually referring to state of the FreeBSD source tree. Anybody doing a google search would probably think CVSup was the shoddiest piece of software in the world. :-( John