Date: Sat, 06 Mar 2004 11:48:57 -0800 (PST) From: John Polstra <jdp@polstra.com> To: (Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?q?Sm=F8rgrav?=) <des@des.no> Cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/dev/ctau ctau.c Message-ID: <XFMail.20040306114857.jdp@polstra.com> In-Reply-To: <xzpoeraudpv.fsf@dwp.des.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 05-Mar-2004 Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote: > John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> writes: >> "Fix tinderbox builds" doesn't imply that the tinderbox itself is broken and >> that's not the impression I got at all when I read it. We all know what the >> tinderbox is and the value of its service (such as finding glitches like >> above). Please don't be so touchy about anything which mentions tinderbox >> assuming that it's being slammed when it's not. > > well, given the number of "this works fine here, what is the tinderbox > doing wrong" comments I get... I am totally sympathetic to your position, DES! It took me about 5 years to stop getting pissed off about all the "Latest CVSup is totally broken!" subject lines that were actually referring to state of the FreeBSD source tree. Anybody doing a google search would probably think CVSup was the shoddiest piece of software in the world. :-( John
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?XFMail.20040306114857.jdp>