Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 8 Jun 1996 09:38:18 +0200 (MET DST)
From:      J Wunsch <j@uriah.heep.sax.de>
To:        nate@sri.MT.net (Nate Williams)
Cc:        bde@zeta.org.au, CVS-committers@freefall.freebsd.org, cvs-all@freefall.freebsd.org, cvs-sys@freefall.freebsd.org, nate@freefall.freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: cvs commit:  src/sys/i386/conf files.i386
Message-ID:  <199606080738.JAA11121@uriah.heep.sax.de>
In-Reply-To: <199606072248.QAA01110@rocky.sri.MT.net> from Nate Williams at "Jun 7, 96 04:48:37 pm"

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
As Nate Williams wrote:

> I used index for 2 reasons.  First, the cop-out reason was because sef
> suggested it.  Secondly, the kernel tends to use the 'BSD' versions of
> things rather than the 'STDC' versions, so I was trying to stay
> compatible with the kernel.  (ie; we use bzero but not memset, etc..)

I think bzero() is a slightly different case.  It's not covered by
STDC, since the latter does only know about memset().  Depending on
the actual architecture however, an implementation of bzero() might be
more effective than memset().

I think X11 did also go the route to replace everything except
bzero().

-- 
cheers, J"org

joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de -- http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ -- NIC: JW11-RIPE
Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199606080738.JAA11121>