From owner-freebsd-hackers Mon Jun 19 07:55:12 1995 Return-Path: hackers-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id HAA22330 for hackers-outgoing; Mon, 19 Jun 1995 07:55:12 -0700 Received: from gateway.cybernet.com (gateway.cybernet.com [192.245.33.1]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id HAA22321 for ; Mon, 19 Jun 1995 07:55:06 -0700 Received: from [192.245.33.12] by gateway.cybernet.com (8.6.8/1.0A) id LAA08008; Mon, 19 Jun 1995 11:28:44 -0400 X-Sender: mtaylor@gateway.cybernet.com Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Mon, 19 Jun 1995 10:55:16 -0400 To: Marc van Kempen From: mtaylor@gateway.cybernet.com (Mark J. Taylor) Subject: Re: [Q] Laplink? Slip or PPP? Cc: hackers@freebsd.org Sender: hackers-owner@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk >> > >> > Both machines are FreeBSD boxes. >> >> Okay, If you are using the YELLOW laplink cable, you are doing this >> parallel, if you are using the BLUE cable [4 heads] you are doing this >> serial. >> > >Does anyone have a wiring schema of the parallel laplink cable? > >Marc. > > >---------------------------------------------------- >Marc van Kempen wmbfmk@urc.tue.nl > >He's dead Jim ..., kick him if you don't believe me. In DOS 6.x: help interlnk (look at the end of the 'notes' section) How nice of them (Microsoft/IBM) to provide it... ;) (it is the same cable that LapLink uses- I've use it for both LapLink and InterLink) -Mark Taylor mtaylor@cybernet.com