Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2003 16:17:59 -0700 From: Marcel Moolenaar <marcel@xcllnt.net> To: Gordon Tetlow <gordont@gnf.org> Cc: arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Making a dynamically-linked root Message-ID: <20030602231759.GE1345@dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net> In-Reply-To: <20030602225807.GI87863@roark.gnf.org> References: <20030602171942.GA87863@roark.gnf.org> <xzp4r3844eb.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> <20030602202947.GE87863@roark.gnf.org> <xzpznl02nry.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> <200306022125.h52LPhhc002291@apollo.backplane.com> <20030602214956.GG87863@roark.gnf.org> <20030602224734.GC1345@dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net> <20030602225807.GI87863@roark.gnf.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Jun 02, 2003 at 03:58:07PM -0700, Gordon Tetlow wrote: > > My hope is to do just that and make it as painless as possible to > switch. It's non-trivial and considering the easy with which foot- > shooting can commence, I hestiate to ask people to touch any of my > patches. Fair enough. > I'm trying to provide options. I'm encouraging a dynamic world (and > think it's the correct solution for 5.2, esp if we are going to be > touting our NSS support). Let's cross that bridge when we come to it. I can't recall seeing a technical reason why we should not *allow* a shared world (I've seen technical reasons why we should allow it). Most, if not all resistence is about making it the default (AFAICT). Let's allow it first. Have a bike shed about the default later. -- Marcel Moolenaar USPA: A-39004 marcel@xcllnt.net
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030602231759.GE1345>