Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2011 16:13:25 +0100 From: Michal Varga <varga.michal@gmail.com> To: Andriy Gapon <avg@freebsd.org> Cc: gnome@freebsd.org, multimedia@freebsd.org, mkbosmans@gmail.com Subject: Re: pulseaudio: module.c: module-detect is deprecated: Please use module-udev-detect instead of module-detect! Message-ID: <1299078805.52738.15.camel@xenon> In-Reply-To: <4D6E558B.5090706@freebsd.org> References: <4D6E558B.5090706@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 2011-03-02 at 16:34 +0200, Andriy Gapon wrote: > Greetings to the collective maintainers of the pulseaudio port :) > > What do you think about silencing the message in the subject line? > It looks like FreeBSD doesn't have udev and it is not coming, so there is no > module-udev-detect either. Of course, something devctl/devd-based would be > useful, but until then the message is not useful, but simply annoying. > That change might go well along with this recent message: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/2011-February/066081.html As I gather from it, upstream developers probably don't even have anyone running FreeBSD and I'd guess they aren't much aware of the issues pulseudio nowadays has here (after all, that deprecation warning being a good indicator). So instead of fixing things like these in ports, I'd say the issue should be reported/fix submitted to upstream, it's pretty much possible that they don't even know that there are systems that don't run evdev (note that I don't mean it offensively, more like speaking generally from experience, it simply happens). m. -- Michal Varga, Stonehenge (Gmail account)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1299078805.52738.15.camel>