From owner-freebsd-fs Wed Mar 13 9: 7:37 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75A8D37B416 for ; Wed, 13 Mar 2002 09:07:29 -0800 (PST) Received: by elvis.mu.org (Postfix, from userid 1192) id 03582AE24A; Wed, 13 Mar 2002 09:07:29 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2002 09:07:28 -0800 From: Alfred Perlstein To: Parity Error Cc: freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: metadata update durability ordering/soft updates Message-ID: <20020313170728.GM32410@elvis.mu.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.27i Sender: owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org * Parity Error [020313 04:08] wrote: > with soft-updates metadata updates are delayed write. I am wondering if, say > there > are two independent structural changes, one after another, and then a crash > happens. > Is there a possibility that the latter structural change got written to disk > before the > former due to some memory replacement policy ? > > could this affect the correctness of some applications ? Of course! This happens with almost any filesystem. This is why you have fsync(2). -Alfred To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-fs" in the body of the message