Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2012 16:23:59 +0000 (UTC) From: Walter Hurry <walterhurry@gmail.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Another question about pkgng Message-ID: <kbse6v$sos$1@ger.gmane.org> References: <k8ralj$gu9$1@ger.gmane.org> <50B1422A.7070902@infracaninophile.co.uk> <k8rn7b$8so$1@ger.gmane.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 25 Nov 2012 00:02:51 +0000, Walter Hurry wrote: > On Sat, 24 Nov 2012 21:54:50 +0000, Matthew Seaman wrote: > >> On 24/11/2012 20:28, Walter Hurry wrote: >>> When I issue 'pkg version -R' it does not actually use the remote >>> repository for comparison; instead it uses the local cache of the >>> remote repository, i.e. it checks local.sqlite against repo.sqlite. >>> >>> That's fine, but should it not do a 'pkg update' first? >> >> That would be consistent with the way 'pkg upgrade' and 'pkg install' >> behave, so personally I think that would be a yes. >> >> Can you open an issue on Github so this point does not get forgotten >> please? >> >> https://github.com/pkgng/pkgng/issues >> > Thanks, Matthew. Done - Issue #396 > Sterling work, Matthew*; thanks for all your efforts. (* It's fixed in 1.1)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?kbse6v$sos$1>