From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 28 20:08:49 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0586A16A4CE for ; Mon, 28 Mar 2005 20:08:49 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp11.wanadoo.fr (smtp11.wanadoo.fr [193.252.22.31]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0BA643D41 for ; Mon, 28 Mar 2005 20:08:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from atkielski.anthony@wanadoo.fr) Received: from me-wanadoo.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mwinf1108.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 8652F1C000A4 for ; Mon, 28 Mar 2005 22:08:47 +0200 (CEST) Received: from pix.atkielski.com (ASt-Lambert-111-2-1-3.w81-50.abo.wanadoo.fr [81.50.80.3]) by mwinf1108.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 6D7331C00083 for ; Mon, 28 Mar 2005 22:08:47 +0200 (CEST) X-ME-UUID: 20050328200847448.6D7331C00083@mwinf1108.wanadoo.fr Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2005 22:08:47 +0200 From: Anthony Atkielski X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <275720968.20050328220847@wanadoo.fr> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <1112035994.3313.2.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <1173965660.20050328020543@wanadoo.fr> <1867854523.20050328120919@wanadoo.fr> <42480F8B.1060405@makeworld.com> <1407725672.20050328162134@wanadoo.fr> <1112035994.3313.2.camel@localhost.localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Anthony's drive issues.Re: ssh password delay X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2005 20:08:49 -0000 Chris Warren writes: > I'm not an NT fan myself, but from reading your past posts, it seems to > do everything you need far better than freebsd. Why not just stick with > NT/2k? Just curious. I wanted to diversify my experience. -- Anthony