From owner-freebsd-questions Thu Oct 9 17:34:51 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id RAA10560 for questions-outgoing; Thu, 9 Oct 1997 17:34:51 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-questions) Received: from mercury.ashland.edu (mercury.ashland.edu [198.30.217.10]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id RAA10555 for ; Thu, 9 Oct 1997 17:34:48 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jroberts@ashland.edu) Received: from freebsd.ashland.edu for jroberts@ashland.edu by mercury.ashland.edu (SMI-8.6/1997.05.08.16.36 ) id UAA24004; Thu, 9 Oct 1997 20:33:33 -0400 Date: Thu, 9 Oct 1997 20:39:55 -0500 (EST) From: Jeff Roberts To: Greg Lehey cc: FreeBSD Questions Discussion List Subject: Re: FBSD: Hayes Accura 56K and FreeBSD? In-Reply-To: <19971010095555.58726@lemis.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Fri, 10 Oct 1997, Greg Lehey wrote: > > My school will not be up to 56K anytime soon (currently at 28.8K), but I > > want to be able to connect with them at their maximum. Is there any > > reason that I shouldn't go with this modem? I'm at 2.2.1-R. > > Yes. There are two conflicting standards. What's the bet that you'll > end up with the one they choose not to supprt? 100%, if my school has anything to say about it! Most people are telling me that I'll be okay with the Acura, so I guess I'll give it a shot. Thanks for responding, Greg. Jeff