From owner-freebsd-questions  Fri Mar  7 21:07:47 1997
Return-Path: <owner-questions>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id VAA21858
          for questions-outgoing; Fri, 7 Mar 1997 21:07:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from hydrogen.dynamik.com (empnet74.empnet.com [208.192.38.108])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id VAA21850
          for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Fri, 7 Mar 1997 21:07:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from natlow@localhost)
	by hydrogen.dynamik.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) id NAA03246;
	Fri, 7 Mar 1997 13:13:14 -0800 (PST)
Date: Fri, 7 Mar 1997 13:13:14 -0800 (PST)
From: Nat Low <natlow@empnet.com>
X-Sender: natlow@hydrogen.dynamik.com
To: Chris Dunn <chris@chias.org>
cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: libc.so.3.0
In-Reply-To: <33206402.359A@chias.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.91.970307131208.1690A-100000@hydrogen.dynamik.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-questions@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, 7 Mar 1997, Chris Dunn wrote:

> Ok, i went through the archives, and came up with the tibit
> that libc.so.3.0 should be in 2.1.6 and above...  im playing
> with the JDK, and copying libc.so.2.2 -> 3.0 dosent seem to
> be cutting it. I upgraded to 2.1.7 the other day, but still
> dont have 3.0    Can anyone clue me in on the ezyest way to
> get libc.so.3.0 ? 

As I understand it, you need to link libc.so.3.0 to libc.so.2.2.  
According to someone whom helped me out with this problem, the 3.0 
version never existed.  When I linked this, it worked fine for me.

> 
> Much thanks!
> -Chris
> 
>