From owner-cvs-all Tue Sep 4 16:52:30 2001 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (adsl-63-207-60-54.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net [63.207.60.54]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86C0437B40B; Tue, 4 Sep 2001 16:52:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id CD35166D0A; Tue, 4 Sep 2001 16:52:18 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2001 16:52:18 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway To: Mikhail Teterin Cc: obrien@FreeBSD.org, ache@nagual.pp.ru, ru@FreeBSD.org, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/lib/libc/stdlib strtol.c strtoll.c strtoq.c strtoul.c strtoull.c strtouq.c Message-ID: <20010904165218.A59467@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20010904140247.A75606@dragon.nuxi.com> <200109042329.f84NTCo57103@aldan.algebra.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-md5; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="LQksG6bCIzRHxTLp" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <200109042329.f84NTCo57103@aldan.algebra.com>; from mi@aldan.algebra.com on Tue, Sep 04, 2001 at 07:29:09PM -0400 Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG --LQksG6bCIzRHxTLp Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Sep 04, 2001 at 07:29:09PM -0400, Mikhail Teterin wrote: > On 4 Sep, David O'Brien wrote: > >> What do you mean exactly? Most of our libc files not have rcsids > >=20 > > That does not mean they should not have them. rcsid's just haven't > > been added yet. I explicited added them to the files you removed them > > from when I added *ll(). Please put them back just the way they were. >=20 > BTW, most of the patches in the ports-tree don't have such IDs, but some > do. Since those IDs are discarded as early as at the "make patch" stage, > I think they are pretty useless -- they don't make it to the compiled > binaries anyway. But what's the general opinion? I'm not sure at what point we started talking about ports. Vulnerabilities in ports are indexed by the port version: when we fix a vulnerability, the version gets bumped, and it's trivial to check whether the installed port is vulnerable. Kris --LQksG6bCIzRHxTLp Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (FreeBSD) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE7lWkyWry0BWjoQKURAnhwAJ9uGqi646uhEAjRiT2Omrlc/xam5gCffkYc BgKdt0CAD1vuyoZvp6QQMmY= =j0J2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --LQksG6bCIzRHxTLp-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message