From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org  Tue Dec  8 14:33:53 2015
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60FE59D3CCF
 for <freebsd-ports-bugs@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org>;
 Tue,  8 Dec 2015 14:33:53 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 50F6C14DE
 for <freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org>; Tue,  8 Dec 2015 14:33:53 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118])
 by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id tB8EXr98084338
 for <freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org>; Tue, 8 Dec 2015 14:33:53 GMT
 (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject: [Bug 205098] emulators/mess: Updated to 0.168
Date: Tue, 08 Dec 2015 14:33:53 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages
X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s)
X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: needs-qa, patch
X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me
X-Bugzilla-Who: freebsd@never4evil.com
X-Bugzilla-Status: New
X-Bugzilla-Priority: ---
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-205098-13-3RgQlN9BMz@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-205098-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-205098-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20
Precedence: list
List-Id: Ports bug reports <freebsd-ports-bugs.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-ports-bugs>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports-bugs>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Dec 2015 14:33:53 -0000

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205098

--- Comment #3 from Paul Boehmer <freebsd@never4evil.com> ---
(In reply to Kubilay Kocak from comment #1)


Yes, you cannot build emulators/mess without the patches referenced in
PR#205097.

That being said, I'm wondering if it would be worthwhile to compress the two
ports into a single port with an options dialog box to build either mame, mess,
or both.

The only potential problem with doing this is what to call the "new" port so
that it's clear to the end user what the port actually is.  Perhaps,
emulators/mame_mess?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.