Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 08 Dec 2015 14:33:53 +0000
From:      bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To:        freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   [Bug 205098] emulators/mess: Updated to 0.168
Message-ID:  <bug-205098-13-3RgQlN9BMz@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-205098-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References:  <bug-205098-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205098

--- Comment #3 from Paul Boehmer <freebsd@never4evil.com> ---
(In reply to Kubilay Kocak from comment #1)


Yes, you cannot build emulators/mess without the patches referenced in
PR#205097.

That being said, I'm wondering if it would be worthwhile to compress the two
ports into a single port with an options dialog box to build either mame, mess,
or both.

The only potential problem with doing this is what to call the "new" port so
that it's clear to the end user what the port actually is.  Perhaps,
emulators/mame_mess?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-205098-13-3RgQlN9BMz>