Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2017 20:42:50 +0000 From: Ben Woods <woodsb02@gmail.com> To: Yuri <yuri@rawbw.com> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, "ports@freebsd.org" <ports@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Option vs. flavor? Message-ID: <CAOc73CAqp9=-8T8czbhk3CP6B2iftkqdXau10JNzmPUXHF0UXg@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <00619a7a-a812-1eac-bdb7-5cecfb891758@rawbw.com> References: <ee10fa7f-9107-1c35-8540-ff34d306865d@rawbw.com> <20171216142849.GL10752@graf.pompo.net> <CAOc73CAe03AuLsgSvw1TfV7Ke9qLvGJtHpqowvF=KPnMOxOjxg@mail.gmail.com> <00619a7a-a812-1eac-bdb7-5cecfb891758@rawbw.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 17 Dec 2017 at 8:29 am, Yuri <yuri@rawbw.com> wrote: > On 12/16/17 11:14, Ben Woods wrote: > > The original post was requesting that the port make fetch only download= s > > the data conditionally based on the option. Not sure how possible that > is. > > > Yes, I was in doubt too. sub-packages will probably always fetch and > build, and I am trying to avoid that. > > So I would just stick to flavor. @withData should be a virtual flavor, > that can be built on demand. > > IMO, this makes most sense. > > > Yuri Hi Yuri, Is there any reason why you want to avoid the download with the port =E2=80= =9Cmake fetch=E2=80=9D? This should not impact you if it uses subpackages and you just install the program with pkg. Regards, Ben > -- -- From: Benjamin Woods woodsb02@gmail.com
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAOc73CAqp9=-8T8czbhk3CP6B2iftkqdXau10JNzmPUXHF0UXg>