From owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 26 23:30:05 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 937E9106566C for ; Tue, 26 Feb 2008 23:30:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DB8D13C457 for ; Tue, 26 Feb 2008 23:30:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m1QNU5vX047337 for ; Tue, 26 Feb 2008 23:30:05 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.2/8.14.1/Submit) id m1QNU50O047336; Tue, 26 Feb 2008 23:30:05 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 23:30:05 GMT Message-Id: <200802262330.m1QNU50O047336@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: Bruce Cran Cc: Subject: Re: bin/119709: [gcc] cc -pg produced bad binaries on x86 in 7.0-RC1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Bruce Cran List-Id: Bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 23:30:05 -0000 The following reply was made to PR bin/119709; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Bruce Cran To: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org, Francis.Dupont@fdupont.fr Cc: Subject: Re: bin/119709: [gcc] cc -pg produced bad binaries on x86 in 7.0-RC1 Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 23:26:37 +0000 Hi, From messages on the freebsd-current mailing list it sounds like this fix should have been MFCd to RELENG_7_0. I'm unable to reproduce this issue on my amd64 machine with sources from the middle of January, but while the patch mentioned on the mailing list changed src/sys/i386/include/profile.h, no changes have been made to that file recently; I suspect the fix was made elsewhere. Are you able to reproduce this problem with more recent sources (e.g 7.0-RC3)? Cheers, Bruce