Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2003 15:03:37 -0800 (PST) From: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> To: phk@phk.freebsd.dk Cc: Alfred Perlstein <bright@mu.org>, Sam Leffler <sam@errno.com>, Peter Wemm <peter@wemm.org>, arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Indiscriminately installing all .h files in /usr/include/* Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0302101500380.49102-100000@InterJet.elischer.org> In-Reply-To: <43866.1044917008@critter.freebsd.dk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 10 Feb 2003 phk@phk.freebsd.dk wrote: > In message <20030210224016.GH88781@elvis.mu.org>, Alfred Perlstein writes: > >* Sam Leffler <sam@errno.com> [030210 14:34] wrote: > >> > > >> > I would prefer labeling the stuff that should go into /usr/include, > >> > it shouldn't be the default to export stuff unless you ask for it. > >> > >> Sticking this stuff inside include files means modifying imported files. > >> I'd actually prefer a mechanism like this to lurk in the Makefiles as you > >> can fully encapsulate requirements like the /usr/include/<dir> is different > >> than the source directory. > > > >That makes sense. > > I can live with that too, as long as the default is "don't install". How about "Don't install if the variable INSTALLABLE_INCLUDES is defined and the file is not listed." That would give us a transition from here to there.. untouched Makefile would act as they do now.. > > -- > Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 > phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 > FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe > Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0302101500380.49102-100000>