From owner-freebsd-apache@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 18 22:33:58 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apache@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AD371065672 for ; Tue, 18 May 2010 22:33:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pgollucci@p6m7g8.com) Received: from EXHUB015-3.exch015.msoutlookonline.net (exhub015-3.exch015.msoutlookonline.net [207.5.72.95]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBF2F8FC12 for ; Tue, 18 May 2010 22:33:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from philip.hq.rws (174.79.184.239) by smtpx15.msoutlookonline.net (207.5.72.103) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.2.234.1; Tue, 18 May 2010 15:33:57 -0700 Message-ID: <4BF315D0.2090708@p6m7g8.com> Date: Tue, 18 May 2010 22:33:52 +0000 From: "Philip M. Gollucci" Organization: P6M7G8 Inc. User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.7) Gecko/20100220 Thunderbird/3.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Geraint Edwards References: <20100518212944.GC51535@yadn.org> In-Reply-To: <20100518212944.GC51535@yadn.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: apache@freebsd.org Subject: Re: www/apache20 versus devel/apr* X-BeenThere: freebsd-apache@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Support of apache-related ports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 May 2010 22:33:58 -0000 On 05/18/10 21:29, Geraint Edwards wrote: > Hi, > It's right, that directory does not exist, > www/apache20/Makefile seems to think it should exist: > > USE_LDCONFIG= ${PREFIX}/lib/apache2 > > so, should that Makefile look like this next line instead (.../libexec/... exists)? > > USE_LDCONFIG= ${PREFIX}/libexec/apache2 Yes, this is ancient though; however, its on my list. > I *think* I just followed the UPDATING instructions for my www/apache20 installation: > > - pkg_delete'd www/apache20 > - ran the suggested portmaster command for devel/apr1 - it was already installed! > - (re)installed www/apache20 which failed at the start with an apr* conflict so devel/apr now devel/apr1 could have come from a variety of things subversion,serf,kde-svn,..... I guess we might want to delete apr too, but I'm not sure. The end result is if you have APACHE_PORT=www/apache20 you going to be tied to devel/apr0 in the end. There are about a billion combination to test the upgrade path for and I'll never be able to catch them all. The end meaning is www/apache20 -> devel/apr0 www/apache22 -> devel/apr1 noting that www/apache20 before update conflicts with the new devel/apr0 and www/apache22 before update conflicts with the new devel/apr1 depending on flags. > I had devel/apr1 installed (the result of the UPDATING instructions?), > but that seems to be a more recent version than www/apache20 allowed. Thats a good check b/c its too new. > > Did I misunderstand the UPDATING info? I think you followed it right, but I'm unsure how to make it better just yet. > Okay, I uninstalled devel/apr1 and installed www/apache20 directly. in your case, the portupgrade -f -o would have been devel/apr0 not devel/apr1. I can't tell you how unsupported httpd 2.0.x is upstream. to quote an httpd dev other then me from less then 5 minutes ago. 22:15 < pquerna> 2.2 has only been out for I dunno 22:15 < pquerna> 6 years -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1024D/DB9B8C1C B90B FBC3 A3A1 C71A 8E70 3F8C 75B8 8FFB DB9B 8C1C Philip M. Gollucci (pgollucci@p6m7g8.com) c: 703.336.9354 VP Apache Infrastructure; Member, Apache Software Foundation Committer, FreeBSD Foundation Consultant, P6M7G8 Inc. Sr. System Admin, Ridecharge Inc. Work like you don't need the money, love like you'll never get hurt, and dance like nobody's watching.