From owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Jun  2 16:35:22 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6327A16A41C
	for <freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org>;
	Thu,  2 Jun 2005 16:35:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from john@essenz.com)
Received: from beck.quonix.net (beck.quonix.net [146.145.66.90])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 123D843D1F
	for <freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org>;
	Thu,  2 Jun 2005 16:35:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from john@essenz.com)
Received: from beck.quonix.net (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by beck.quonix.net (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j52GZIGO005273
	for <freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org>; Thu, 2 Jun 2005 12:35:18 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (essenz@localhost)
	by beck.quonix.net (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) with ESMTP id j52GZIrG005270
	for <freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org>; Thu, 2 Jun 2005 12:35:18 -0400 (EDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: beck.quonix.net: essenz owned process doing -bs
Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2005 12:35:18 -0400 (EDT)
From: John Von Essen <john@essenz.com>
X-X-Sender: essenz@beck.quonix.net
To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org
In-Reply-To: <20050602091600.Q20286@Osgiliath.home.lan>
Message-ID: <20050602123010.N4511@beck.quonix.net>
References: <20050602091600.Q20286@Osgiliath.home.lan>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-SpamAssassin-3.0.3-Score: -2.82/5.8 ALL_TRUSTED
X-MimeDefang-2.51: beck.quonix.net
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.51 on 146.145.66.90
Subject: Re: Negative Review of FreeBSD 5.4
X-BeenThere: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: FreeBSD Evangelism <freebsd-advocacy.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-advocacy>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-advocacy-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-advocacy>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-advocacy-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-advocacy>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-advocacy-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2005 16:35:22 -0000


>From bottom of page:

Market: Low-end Web and Email servers, ...

What the hell is that supposed to mean?

Me personally, I have no sympathy for people who struggle to get FreeBSD
to perform on bleeding edge hardware (new fancy SATA controllers, weird
next generation AMD motherboards)

>From a server environment, Intel platform (P4 and Xeon) with SCSI (RAID
and non-RAID), you'll never experience this kind of trouble.

-john


On Thu, 2 Jun 2005, Neal E. Westfall wrote:

> Anybody have any thoughts on this review?
>
> http://os.newsforge.com/article.pl?sid=05/05/24/2153257&tid=8
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-advocacy
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-advocacy-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
>