From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Apr  1 08:43:18 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id A94D116A4CF; Thu,  1 Apr 2004 08:43:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.pcnet.com (mail.pcnet.com [204.213.232.4])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 4F04C43D39; Thu,  1 Apr 2004 08:43:18 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from eischen@vigrid.com)
Received: from mail.pcnet.com (mail.pcnet.com [204.213.232.4])
	by mail.pcnet.com (8.12.10/8.12.1) with ESMTP id i31Ggxtf024614;
	Thu, 1 Apr 2004 11:42:59 -0500 (EST)
Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2004 11:42:59 -0500 (EST)
From: Daniel Eischen <eischen@vigrid.com>
X-Sender: eischen@pcnet5.pcnet.com
To: "Jacques A. Vidrine" <nectar@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <20040401153815.GD60392@madman.celabo.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.10.10404011141270.23686-100000@pcnet5.pcnet.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org
cc: Sean McNeil <sean@mcneil.com>
cc: Oliver Eikemeier <eikemeier@fillmore-labs.com>
Subject: Re: nss_ldap broken
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Apr 2004 16:43:18 -0000

On Thu, 1 Apr 2004, Jacques A. Vidrine wrote:

> On Thu, Apr 01, 2004 at 10:16:25AM -0500, Daniel Eischen wrote:
> > I think the best way is to avoid having shared libraries needlessly linked to
> > a threads library.
> 
> If we can guarantee that -pthread would give that behavior ``forever'',
> then great.  I guess we've come full circle  (``-pthread good''
> ``-pthread bad, don't use it'' ``-pthread good'').  :-)
> 
> Then how does one pick an alternate threading library?  Say `libmap' and

Override PTHREAD_LIBS to be -lthrlibofchoice for
the port you are building.

> I'll choke. :-)  I seem to recall that one of the GCC guys made a
> detailed proposal for extending the syntax of `-pthread' to handle
> alternate threading libraries, but I can't find that posting right now.

-- 
Dan Eischen