From owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 17 00:12:31 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 561DD16A420; Fri, 17 Mar 2006 00:12:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ceri@submonkey.net) Received: from shrike.submonkey.net (cpc2-cdif2-0-0-cust107.cdif.cable.ntl.com [81.104.168.108]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70FFD43D46; Fri, 17 Mar 2006 00:12:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ceri@submonkey.net) Received: from ceri by shrike.submonkey.net with local (Exim 4.60 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1FK2Zx-0005uP-PV; Fri, 17 Mar 2006 00:12:29 +0000 Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2006 00:12:29 +0000 From: Ceri Davies To: Mikhail Teterin Message-ID: <20060317001229.GR36929@submonkey.net> Mail-Followup-To: Ceri Davies , Mikhail Teterin , postmaster@freebsd.org, freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org References: <200603161902.56596.mi+mx@aldan.algebra.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="SvyA5ywaG/v2A5dH" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200603161902.56596.mi+mx@aldan.algebra.com> X-PGP: finger ceri@FreeBSD.org User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Sender: Ceri Davies Cc: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org, postmaster@freebsd.org Subject: Re: spam detection notification X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2006 00:12:31 -0000 --SvyA5ywaG/v2A5dH Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Mar 16, 2006 at 07:02:56PM -0500, Mikhail Teterin wrote: > ?????? 16 ???????? 2006 18:52, Ceri Davies ?? ????????: > > There was a glitch and everything sent to the bugs database was flagged= as > > spam. ?This has been fixed. >=20 > So, is my PR logged in or do I have to resend it? If you sent it in the last two days, and received the auto-response with the PR number, then its logged. Otherwise it may have gone astray at another point in the processing. Basically, this problem merely meant that you would have received the "that tasted like spam" autoresponse and there would have been a delay on your submission being processed by GNATS. > > As for your question, vacation(1) might need to grow an option for that. >=20 > Until then, maybe, you guys can use something else? Procmail? Probably. This is "good enough" when spamc works as expected, though, so it will go somewhere near the bottom of my pile, I'm afraid. Ceri --=20 That must be wonderful! I don't understand it at all. -- Moliere --SvyA5ywaG/v2A5dH Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFEGf7tocfcwTS3JF8RAqsyAJ9D7DqlCcfazZ4dF258qhnj5xFYBgCglg7C Go1BC4LxiUOqAgGY06gxUuo= =tD0z -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --SvyA5ywaG/v2A5dH--