Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2012 19:45:47 -0400 From: Jason Hellenthal <jhellenthal@dataix.net> To: Jakub Lach <jakub_lach@mailplus.pl> Cc: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Wildebeest Licensing Message-ID: <20120601234547.GA75602@DataIX.net> In-Reply-To: <1338592078824-5714091.post@n5.nabble.com> References: <1SHqI5-0000qk-02@internal.tormail.net> <201204271645.18801.mitchell@wyatt672earp.force9.co.uk> <86y5pgn8la.fsf@ds4.des.no> <201204281652.28123.mitchell@wyatt672earp.force9.co.uk> <86pqapmxmc.fsf@ds4.des.no> <1338592078824-5714091.post@n5.nabble.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Late for the show but not the party! On Fri, Jun 01, 2012 at 04:07:58PM -0700, Jakub Lach wrote: > I would add- > > "Some strange license? Ditch it, we > are not going to take chances." - Voice of > Responsible (TM) corporate management. > > Seriously, why they should pay for > legal expertise and still would not be > sure of (practical) consequences? > > Popular/known licenses are hard enough... > > And if stake is high enough some obvious > things easily can become debatable. > > But interesting idea nonetheless, I would > like to read it again after feeling somewhat > comfortable (If this time comes at all) with > EU IP law and seek for possible problems. > > But it has theoretical value at best. > > -- > View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/BSD-license-tp5632493p5714091.html > Sent from the freebsd-advocacy mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-advocacy > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-advocacy-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" -- - (2^(N-1))
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20120601234547.GA75602>