From owner-svn-src-all@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 22 23:17:39 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx2.freebsd.org (mx2.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::35]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66764106566B; Tue, 22 Nov 2011 23:17:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (hub.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::36]) by mx2.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6A5A1605F1; Tue, 22 Nov 2011 23:15:25 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4ECC2D0D.6080608@FreeBSD.org> Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2011 15:15:25 -0800 From: Doug Barton Organization: http://www.FreeBSD.org/ User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111105 Thunderbird/8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ben Kaduk References: <201111211635.pALGZvSS051067@svn.freebsd.org> <4A740CCF-AB73-41E3-B2C6-344B4A067B00@FreeBSD.org> <8662ibkfjs.fsf@ds4.des.no> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: src-committers@freebsd.org, Rui Paulo , svn-src-all@freebsd.org, =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=F8rgra?=, svn-src-head@freebsd.org, =?ISO-8859-1?Q?v?= Subject: Re: svn commit: r227797 - head/share/mk X-BeenThere: svn-src-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "SVN commit messages for the entire src tree \(except for " user" and " projects" \)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2011 23:17:39 -0000 On 11/22/2011 2:26 PM, Ben Kaduk wrote: > 2011/11/22 Rui Paulo : >> On 2011/11/22, at 21:33, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote: >> >>> Rui Paulo writes: >>>> With this change, I can no longer update a FreeBSD 9.0-current system >>>> from June 2010 to FreeBSD 10.0. I suspect I'm not the only one. >>> >>> Sorry, my mind reader is broken at the moment, so you'll have to provide >>> more information than that. >> >> >> If I had more information, I would have provided it. I'm still diagnosing the problem someone else created. > > That is to say ... "take a machine running 9-current from june 2010 > which has no issues. Fetch a HEAD source tree and try the usual > buildworld process, and watch it explode." > Right? I'm not sure that's an interesting test case, since we don't "Officially" support major version upgrades other than from the latest -stable version of the branch immediately before the one you're trying to upgrade to. IOW, the interesting question is, does it work if you upgrade to stable/9 first? Doug -- "We could put the whole Internet into a book." "Too practical." Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS. Yours for the right price. :) http://SupersetSolutions.com/