From owner-cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 3 19:06:49 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-ports@freebsd.org Received: from green.homeunix.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E488416A4CE; Fri, 3 Dec 2004 19:06:48 +0000 (GMT) Received: from green.homeunix.org (green@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by green.homeunix.org (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id iB3J6mGc006298; Fri, 3 Dec 2004 14:06:48 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from green@green.homeunix.org) Received: (from green@localhost) by green.homeunix.org (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id iB3J6mTg006297; Fri, 3 Dec 2004 14:06:48 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from green) Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2004 14:06:47 -0500 From: Brian Fundakowski Feldman To: Gerald Pfeifer Message-ID: <20041203190647.GB1205@green.homeunix.org> References: <200412031713.iB3HD9lJ085681@repoman.freebsd.org> <20041203172500.GA1205@green.homeunix.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org cc: Gerald Pfeifer cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org cc: ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/emulators/wine Makefile distinfo pkg-plist ports/emulators/wine/files patch-dlls-ntdll patch-loader::main.c patch-program::Makefile.in X-BeenThere: cvs-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Dec 2004 19:06:49 -0000 On Fri, Dec 03, 2004 at 07:13:03PM +0100, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: > On Fri, 3 Dec 2004, Brian Fundakowski Feldman wrote: > > I'm only using 20041019, but that alone doesn't make it work for me. > > The rtld still cannot map anything after wine takes over the whole > > address space. Did wine somehow stop doing that, so that dlopen() can > > function? > > I've got to run now, but I have received at least two independent reports > by users that this patch and using the latest version of Wine solved all > the issues they had for _their_ applications. > > Both were running 5.3, and I believe we'll actually have to require that > (or at least 5.2.1) for Wine, even if it builds on 4.x as well. Cool, good news that it definitely may be fixed :) I'm going to try and see when I get home. -- Brian Fundakowski Feldman \'[ FreeBSD ]''''''''''\ <> green@FreeBSD.org \ The Power to Serve! \ Opinions expressed are my own. \,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,\