Date: Sun, 6 Jun 2004 14:03:34 +0200 From: Michael Nottebrock <michaelnottebrock@gmx.net> To: Jose M Rodriguez <freebsd@wanadoo.es> Cc: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Subject: Re: URW Type1 Fonts Message-ID: <200406061403.39539.michaelnottebrock@gmx.net> In-Reply-To: <200406061335.25901.freebsd@wanadoo.es> References: <200406061228.33519.freebsd@wanadoo.es> <200406061244.10664.michaelnottebrock@gmx.net> <200406061335.25901.freebsd@wanadoo.es>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--Boundary-02=_bgwwASxLAzjsVHq Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Sunday 06 June 2004 13:35, Jose M Rodriguez wrote: > All seems the same fonts, but there are diferences in the fonts.* files > and even on the fonts. I see. That would pretty much pacify POLA as far as I'm concerned. > > My main reason for the move are: > - gs and X aren't using the same 35 type1 fonts. Hmmmmmmmmmm, that could actually explain some strange printing bugs people = are=20 seeing with things like KOffice. =2D-=20 ,_, | Michael Nottebrock | lofi@freebsd.org (/^ ^\) | FreeBSD - The Power to Serve | http://www.freebsd.org \u/ | K Desktop Environment on FreeBSD | http://freebsd.kde.org --Boundary-02=_bgwwASxLAzjsVHq Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBAwwgbXhc68WspdLARAl16AJ4wg0GLSUDnQngqFcNZDKElm4MJJgCeMall ilRq6FUfjEb/vbqzEo3obEE= =yNdP -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Boundary-02=_bgwwASxLAzjsVHq--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200406061403.39539.michaelnottebrock>