Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2017 20:46:58 -0400 From: Jim Ohlstein <jim@ohlste.in> To: freebsd-questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>, David Mehler <dave.mehler@gmail.com> Subject: Re: gnupg and gnupg2 Message-ID: <d27daccd-e064-4fb1-9809-a786c9b4345a@Spark> In-Reply-To: <CAPORhP46hhzQ8Nc-UR-E%2BdcaNtj7RX7uYq-gA8S99Gij%2B=rhdQ@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAPORhP46hhzQ8Nc-UR-E%2BdcaNtj7RX7uYq-gA8S99Gij%2B=rhdQ@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
They're both ports, not part of base. Evidently you have at least one port that relies on each. Jim Ohlstein On Apr 20, 2017, 8:27 PM -0400, David Mehler <dave.mehler@gmail.com>, wrote: > Hello, > > I've got a 10.3 system. I just noticed I've got both gnupg 1.4 and > gnupg 2.0. My question is can I get rid of gnupg1 and use the gnupg2? > > Thanks. > Dave. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?d27daccd-e064-4fb1-9809-a786c9b4345a>