From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 14 15:42:38 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46729506; Tue, 14 Oct 2014 15:42:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dmz-mailsec-scanner-8.mit.edu (dmz-mailsec-scanner-8.mit.edu [18.7.68.37]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AED0FDD2; Tue, 14 Oct 2014 15:42:37 +0000 (UTC) X-AuditID: 12074425-f79e46d000002583-55-543d4465f49c Received: from mailhub-auth-1.mit.edu ( [18.9.21.35]) (using TLS with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by dmz-mailsec-scanner-8.mit.edu (Symantec Messaging Gateway) with SMTP id D7.DE.09603.5644D345; Tue, 14 Oct 2014 11:42:29 -0400 (EDT) Received: from outgoing.mit.edu (outgoing-auth-1.mit.edu [18.9.28.11]) by mailhub-auth-1.mit.edu (8.13.8/8.9.2) with ESMTP id s9EFgSRv013806; Tue, 14 Oct 2014 11:42:29 -0400 Received: from multics.mit.edu (system-low-sipb.mit.edu [18.187.2.37]) (authenticated bits=56) (User authenticated as kaduk@ATHENA.MIT.EDU) by outgoing.mit.edu (8.13.8/8.12.4) with ESMTP id s9EFgQ0f013460 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 14 Oct 2014 11:42:27 -0400 Received: (from kaduk@localhost) by multics.mit.edu (8.12.9.20060308) id s9EFgPni016119; Tue, 14 Oct 2014 11:42:25 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2014 11:42:25 -0400 (EDT) From: Benjamin Kaduk To: =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Olivier_Cochard-Labb=E9?= Subject: Re: Enabling VIMAGE by default for FreeBSD 11? In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: User-Agent: Alpine 1.10 (GSO 962 2008-03-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFprBKsWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUixCmqrJvmYhti8J7TYvb0aUwWH3a0M1nM uvmVyeLZ1mYWBxaPaV9yPGZ8ms8SwBTFZZOSmpNZllqkb5fAlbH13F7mgu1sFZcmNbI0MK5l 7WLk5JAQMJGYtucgO4QtJnHh3nq2LkYuDiGB2UwSe5dfYIRwNjJK/GiYAtYhJHCISeJ/QwSE 3cAo0XSdD8RmEdCWOLtwCyOIzSagIjHzzUY2EFtEwEniy4957CCDmAXWM0o8b9wOlhAWMJeY 0v8SbCinQKDEgoOLwM7gFXCUWHntDtQZ3UwS628/AysSFdCRWL1/CgtEkaDEyZlPgGwOoKmB EjunaE5gFJyFJDMLIQMSZhbQlXiz6iAThK0tcf9mG9sCRpZVjLIpuVW6uYmZOcWpybrFyYl5 ealFuhZ6uZkleqkppZsYQYHO7qK6g3HCIaVDjAIcjEo8vAWRNiFCrIllxZW5hxglOZiURHlL jG1DhPiS8lMqMxKLM+KLSnNSiw8xSnAwK4nwKnAA5XhTEiurUovyYVLSHCxK4rybfvCFCAmk J5akZqemFqQWwWRlODiUJHgDnIEaBYtS01Mr0jJzShDSTBycIMN5gIZLgdTwFhck5hZnpkPk TzHqcrQ0ve1lEmLJy89LlRLnPeUEVCQAUpRRmgc3B5agXjGKA70lzCsDMooHmNzgJr0CWsIE tOR1sTXIkpJEhJRUA+NJbv9JC0o2dG86USdeuOrdE6sFUcHXLa1yzfhdCyWvLrtRbRJ5fp5z 2uYjstcbxMqFzT+Ja8dZMWx/md1rfzDkTuxXtsS3Wr3f1x31U1QWfK8wxcWk79GORr9JTwTX eyf+rImV6HhW0SL1TeSkSZtx8QbbOgn7/fZm7145n/qvGv9U+vdOSyWW4oxEQy3mouJEAB7O B8wrAwAA Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 Cc: FreeBSD Net , "freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org" , freebsd-arch X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2014 15:42:38 -0000 On Tue, 14 Oct 2014, Olivier Cochard-Labb=E9 wrote: > I can use my forwarding/firewalling 10Giga lab for testing VIMAGE impact. > Here are my ministat results (smallest packet size, value in > packet-per-second, about 2000 flows). > =3D> I didn't see lot's of performance impact with VIMAGE option added in > kernel. Surely we would also want to test on some "low-end" networks as well ... we still have some 10/half networks here (luckily, nowhere that I frequent). -Ben From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 14 17:44:36 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BE36B8A6 for ; Tue, 14 Oct 2014 17:44:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from sam.nabble.com (sam.nabble.com [216.139.236.26]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A0DCCCD1 for ; Tue, 14 Oct 2014 17:44:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.236.26] (helo=sam.nabble.com) by sam.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Xe69D-0006wG-Mk for freebsd-arch@freebsd.org; Tue, 14 Oct 2014 10:44:35 -0700 Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2014 10:44:35 -0700 (PDT) From: timp To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Message-ID: <1413308675697-5956783.post@n5.nabble.com> In-Reply-To: References: Subject: Re: Enabling VIMAGE by default for FreeBSD 11? MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2014 17:44:36 -0000 > Hi, > > What action items are left to enable VIMAGE by default for FreeBSD 11? > Not everyone uses bhyve, so VIMAGE is quite useful when using jails. > -- > Craig That would be extremely great! There is a big hole in FreeBSD that already has a patch in such direction (os level virtualization). Another stuff which would be extremely useful in GENERIC then is RCTL and RACCT. I don't know why it's still not in GENERIC. -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/Enabling-VIMAGE-by-default-for-FreeBSD-11-tp5956040p5956783.html Sent from the freebsd-arch mailing list archive at Nabble.com.