Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2005 20:00:46 -0500 From: Kirk Strauser <kirk@strauser.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: postgrey question Message-ID: <200506012000.49914.kirk@strauser.com> In-Reply-To: <e905ce81d0bc627fe06596d5ab6ac298@chrononomicon.com> References: <0a6397740f09ea4ac7cce0b1bead3bde@chrononomicon.com> <20050601133325.6f5a11ac.wmoran@potentialtech.com> <e905ce81d0bc627fe06596d5ab6ac298@chrononomicon.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--nextPart1320437.eaL9IjLvqi Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Wednesday 01 June 2005 12:44 pm, Bart Silverstrim wrote: > That's where I was a little confused (kirk? Insight, clarification?) > because I thought that line would have it pass the message to another > queue on port 10023 of the localhost, like the way Amavis runs. That's correct. > I didn't know if that meant it would be running three postfix queues now > or if it is just a misunderstanding on my part. Sort of, in a way, except that in theory any MTA (or other process) could u= se=20 the amavis or postgrey ports, so they're not exactly Postfix-specific. =2D-=20 Kirk Strauser --nextPart1320437.eaL9IjLvqi Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBCnlpB5sRg+Y0CpvERAseiAJ41d4gUdOsmVL6HhjKvpWsqa4uI7ACfVkpa 46rbCVZTEBx3j9rEMhxNHs8= =bG/U -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1320437.eaL9IjLvqi--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200506012000.49914.kirk>