From owner-freebsd-pf@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 16 14:16:35 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2DBD16A417 for ; Fri, 16 Nov 2007 14:16:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dhartmei@insomnia.benzedrine.cx) Received: from insomnia.benzedrine.cx (insomnia.benzedrine.cx [IPv6:2001:6f8:1098::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79CE313C45D for ; Fri, 16 Nov 2007 14:16:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dhartmei@insomnia.benzedrine.cx) Received: from insomnia.benzedrine.cx (localhost.benzedrine.cx [127.0.0.1]) by insomnia.benzedrine.cx (8.14.1/8.13.4) with ESMTP id lAGEGZv0027727 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-DSS-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 16 Nov 2007 15:16:35 +0100 (MET) Received: (from dhartmei@localhost) by insomnia.benzedrine.cx (8.14.1/8.12.10/Submit) id lAGEGZnK000154; Fri, 16 Nov 2007 15:16:35 +0100 (MET) Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2007 15:16:35 +0100 From: Daniel Hartmeier To: "N. Ersen SISECI" Message-ID: <20071116141635.GE29432@insomnia.benzedrine.cx> References: <473D9922.4010207@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <473D9922.4010207@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.12-2006-07-14 Cc: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Nat Pass and PF Default Rule X-BeenThere: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Technical discussion and general questions about packet filter \(pf\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2007 14:16:35 -0000 On Fri, Nov 16, 2007 at 03:20:34PM +0200, N. Ersen SISECI wrote: > I changed PF's default rule in kernel (pf_ioctl.h). And than i restarted > my server. Uh, if you do that you deal with the fallout yourself ;) Seriously, there is no reason to do that. Adding a block rule to your ruleset does the trick of defaulting to blocking. Daniel