Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 23 Mar 2010 08:36:47 +0100
From:      Dominic Fandrey <kamikaze@bsdforen.de>
To:        freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: nroff -man, .An Aq formatting
Message-ID:  <4BA86F8F.1030807@bsdforen.de>
In-Reply-To: <ho810g$19g0$1@lorvorc.mips.inka.de>
References:  <4BA5D7B0.8000507@bsdforen.de> <4BA6C5DA.6040100@FreeBSD.org>	<86634ojxl7.fsf@ds4.des.no> <ho810g$19g0$1@lorvorc.mips.inka.de>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 22/03/2010 16:05, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
> Dag-Erling Smørgrav <des@des.no> wrote:
> 
>>>> It has come to my attention that whereas with LANG=C "nroff -man"
>>>> formats ".An name Aq email" as "name <email>", it uses different
>>>> characters with LANG=en_GB.UTF-8 "name ⟨email⟩". These characters
>>>> are appropriate, but a lot of unicode fonts don't seem to have them.
>>
>> This is definitely a bug, since (as avg@ points out) you can no longer
>> copy-paste the name & address into an email client.
>>
>> AFAIK (judging from the Unicode group they're in) these characters are
>> intended mainly for writing things like <ENTER> and <CTRL>+<F1> in
>> technical documentation.
> 
> And we probably have that usage in other man pages.  It is not clear
> to me if the problem is the use of these characters for angle quotes
> or the use of .Aq for email addresses.

I got it out of the wpi(4) manual first. It probably appears in other
places, too.

-- 
A: Because it fouls the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail? 



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4BA86F8F.1030807>